Shamil Sheikh Agreement

The two sides agreed to resume permanent status negotiations in order to reach an agreement on permanent status. They reaffirmed that permanent status negotiations would lead to the implementation of Security Council resolutions 242 and 338. Both sides agreed to work resolutely towards a framework agreement and set a timetable for achieving this goal. Pakistan`s foreign minister said he still had to see for himself the Indian prime minister`s recent remark, but he asked if that was India`s position, “what is Sharm el-Sheikh, what is this deal?” The memorandum aimed to implement the Interim Agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip (Oslo II) of September 1995 and all other agreements between the PLO and Israel since September 1993: Protocol on Economic Relations (1994); Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Territory of Jericho (1994); Washington Declaration (1994); Agreement on the Preparatory Delegation of Powers and Competences between Israel and the PLO (1994); Protocol on the Continuation of transfers of competences and competences (1995); Wye River Memorandum (1998). The Government of the State of Israel (“GOI”) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) undertake to implement fully and mutually the Interim Agreement and all other agreements concluded between them since September 1993 (`the previous agreements`) and all outstanding commitments arising from previous agreements. Without deviating from the other demands of previous agreements, the two sides agreed as follows: the stakes of the Sharm el-Sheikh agreement, Pakistan asked on Saturday, after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh indicated that the current relations between the two neighbors were “not conducive to any discussion”. Israeli and Palestinian negotiators also discussed several topics: the two sides agreed on the following principles to facilitate and enable the construction of the Gaza port. Principles should not undermine or anticipate the outcome of the permanent status negotiations: “If it has been agreed and engaged that dialogue is the only way forward, what is there to feel timid?” he asked. .

. .