Include all documents and priorities It is extremely important to remember that all documents that must be part of the transaction are mentioned throughout the contractual clause. Otherwise, an ancillary receipt may be excluded from the transaction. This will not be a problem if there is only one contract, but in the case of a complex transaction, it is important to refer to all the relevant documents. It is also imperative that the contract clearly indicates, either throughout the contractual clause or elsewhere, which transactional document takes precedence in the event of inconsistency or conflict with other documents. In summary, parties should ensure that they are clear in advance about what has been included and excluded before it is executed. As we have seen, it is often necessary to introduce additional clauses into the Treaty in order to exclude tacit clauses or pre-contractual assurances or to include certain pre-contractual agreements. Otherwise, a simple misunderstanding could lead to costly litigation. Your legal team will be able to ensure that the entire agreement is drafted correctly, but they will not have attended all the contractual negotiations or will have copies of all the correspondence between the parties, especially in the early stages, and your consideration of this clause is therefore essential. However, there are many restrictions on the effectiveness of entire contractual clauses.
Clear wordingThe courts generally seem to interpret entire contractual clauses closely. For this reason, and for reasons of certainty, they must be formulated with care and precision and cover all relevant areas. For example, if you want certain implied conditions to be covered by the clause and therefore not to be considered part of the contract, this must be clearly explained. Your legal team will be able to advise them, but if a statement, promise, commitment or something like this was made during the negotiations or if the parties to the agreement have an accepted method of cooperation, you need to make sure that your legal advisors are aware of it so that they can be treated accordingly. Whether a comprehensive contractual term (unlike the Hipwell clause) serves to exclude implied terms depends on a number of factors. In NF Football Investments Ltd v NFCC Group Holdings Limited, the High Court found that the entire contractual clause, when interpreted in the context of the entire contract, precludes any claim for damages for misrepresentation, although there is no explicit exclusion to that effect. . .